Talk:Brain
The good article status of this article is being reassessed by the community to determine whether the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page. Date: 19:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC) |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brain article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Brain has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-3 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Brain:
|
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Tot kto dumaet ..
[edit]што думать - только время терять - тот так и думает. 85.140.24.121 (talk) 22:15, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
GA concerns
[edit]I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:
- There is uncited text, including the entire "Birds" section.
- At just over 9,000 words, this article might be too long. I do not think information needs to be removed, but perhaps information can be summarised more effectively, and the block quotes evaluated to see if they are still needed.
- The "Society and culture" section is underdeveloped, with only one line about its use in food and no information about its use in literature or the arts, especially its use as an allegory.
Is anyone willing to address the above, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 15:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
[edit]- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
There are uncited statements, including almost the entire "Birds" section. At over 9,000 words, WP:TOOBIG recommends splitting off the article; since this is such a big topic, it might not be possible but should probably be considered after a subject-matter expert tries making this more concise. The "Society and culture" section is underdeveloped, with only one line about its use in food and no information about its use in literature or the arts, especially its use as an allegory. Z1720 (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Good article reassessment nominees
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- GA-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- GA-Class level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- GA-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- GA-Class neuroscience articles
- Top-importance neuroscience articles
- GA-Class Anatomy articles
- Top-importance Anatomy articles
- Anatomy articles about neuroanatomy
- WikiProject Anatomy articles
- GA-Class Animal anatomy articles
- Top-importance Animal anatomy articles
- WikiProject Animal anatomy articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists